Testimony submitted to the Presidential Commission on Election Administration
September 4, 2013
I am Ellen Mattleman Kaplan, Vice President and Policy Director of the Committee of Seventy, a non-partisan and not-for-profit watchdog organization fighting for honest and effective government, fair elections and better informed citizens.
I appreciate the opportunity to be here today. My testimony will focus on what really happens on-the-ground that gets in the way of voting in Philadelphia and the voters having confidence that their votes count.
Let me start by saying that the Committee of Seventy, which I will tell you more about in a minute, supports many of the reforms others will recommend today to make elections in Pennsylvania fairer and more accessible to voters, such as early voting, expedited voter registration and a revamped redistricting process that will result in genuinely competitive elections. We strongly urge this Presidential Commission to adopt these recommendations, notwithstanding that the ultimate enactment of most voting laws is up to an individual state.
But, sadly, here in Philadelphia, putting these reforms in place today would be like adding a GPS to a broken down Model T Ford.
However, the Commission can play a powerful role in setting standards for how elections in a voter’s city or county are operated – in other words, for prescribing how the basic parts of the Model T Ford should be fixed. For it is what happens at the local level that determines whether a voter’s experience is positive or negative.
The Philadelphia voting experience is not a good one for far too many people.
The Committee of Seventy feels uniquely qualified to talk about this. For more than a century, Seventy has championed fair, honest and well-run elections in Philadelphia. During each year’s primary and general elections, we recruit and train non-partisan volunteers to visit city polling places to answer voters’ questions, resolve minor issues and report more serious problems to law enforcement officials. Over 1,000 volunteers assisted during the 2012 presidential elections, not only in Philadelphia but in the Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery counties. To our knowledge, our Election Day Program is the largest local elections oversight operation of its kind in the country.
In the last two years, Seventy has also been the state headquarters for the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law’s Election Protection hotline (1-866-OUR-VOTE). For several weeks before each election, and on Election Day, Seventy-trained hotline volunteers take calls from voters all across Pennsylvania who need help with voting or experience problems at the polls. On November 6, 2012 – which, in addition to being a presidential election, was the day on which the state’s voter ID law was expected to go into effect – the hotline received over 8,000 calls.
Seventy’s passion for bringing about the most positive experience for voters is a year-round effort. We field thousands of calls related to voting and issue alerts about election deadlines. We write reports and speak out regularly on ways to improve local elections. We are the only organization that regularly attends meetings of the City Commissioners, who run city elections.
In 2012, Seventy spearheaded the Pennsylvania Voter ID Coalition, a coalition of 175 organizational members to provide non-partisan education to all Pennsylvania voters – regardless of their political affiliation – on the requirements of the voter ID law. Although the law was enjoined for the November 2012 election and, subsequently, for all of 2013, we continue to be sought after by voters and the national, state and local media for trustworthy non-partisan information related to voter ID.
Seventy was also the liaison between the coalition and the Department of State, which is responsible for administering statewide elections, on how to make it as easy as possible for voters without a photo identification that would be accepted at the polls to obtain one. We believe we were instrumental in the adoption of several changes that eased the requirements for obtaining photo identification after the law was passed in March 2012.
As I said earlier, our testimony today concentrates on what we believe – based on our own track record of over 100 years monitoring local elections – to be a bad voting experience for many Philadelphians.
Elections are run by three independently elected City Commissioners, two of whom are Democrats and one a Republican whose seat is guaranteed by the city’s Home Rule Charter. Two Commissioners – Republican Al Schmidt and Democrat Stephanie Singer – were first elected in 2011. Each of them, separately but often together, campaigned on platforms of bringing greater transparency and efficiencies to the operation of elections. In his 2011 campaign flyer, Al Schmidt promised to fix the “voting irregularities and election problems [that] have plagued Philadelphia for years.”
The first test of the new Commissioners’ reform agenda was in 2012. And the November 6, 2012 presidential election turned out to be perhaps the worst-run election in the city’s history, as well as a national embarrassment that generated probes by the Department of State, Mayor Michael Nutter, City Controller Alan Butkovitz, and the City Commissioners (with separate reports issued by Singer and the then-Acting Voter Registration Commissioner). Reading through the reports of these probes, which we will share with this Commission, reveals a chilling tale of massive confusion, mismanagement and partisanship.
The Schmidt-Singer reform team, which began to break down almost immediately after their inauguration in January 2012, completely fell apart when Singer was ousted by her two colleagues as chair of the City Commissioners the morning after the November election.
Many of the problems that occurred on November 6, 2012 may already have been addressed. But we won’t really know if they are fixed until the next high turn-out election – which is likely to be the 2016 presidential election.
It is no secret that the Committee of Seventy strongly believes that the people in charge of city elections should not be chosen through a partisan election process. Especially in a city where nearly 80% of the voters are Democrats and just over 12% are Republicans, there will at least be a perception that actions are taken or not taken because of political motives or to advance the Commissioners’ political aspirations. The same concerns will be true in jurisdictions dominated by the Republican Party.
The Committee of Seventy urges this Presidential Commission to create standards, and issue a set of recommendations, that are designed to result in local elections that conform with the most modern and up-to-date voting practices, are free of partisanship and patronage, are operated with the greatest efficiency, and by people with an unwavering commitment to extraordinary customer service.
Recommendations should at least include (1) requiring polling place workers to receive adequate compensation for working a 13-hour day at the polls, (2) mandating training of poll workers before each election, (3) replacing manual inputting of voter data with faster and more accurate methods, and (4) strengthening communications to city voters, including by social media.
We further urge the Commission to support the continued use of federal dollars to assist the implementation of its recommendations. The lack of state or local resources cannot continue to be an excuse for not putting necessary reforms into place or for failing to provide voters with accurate and timely information.
This will be a herculean task. But here in Pennsylvania, voting is a constitutional right. The voters must be allowed to exercise this right freely, fairly and without any fear whatsoever that it will be abridged in any way.
The Committee of Seventy appreciates the Commission’s consideration of its testimony.